This chart highlights a CLOV trade setup on the 30-minute timeframe. The entry point is at $3.05, with a stop-loss (SL) set at $2.96 to manage risk. The setup targets a potential breakout above the descending trendline, aiming to test key resistance levels: Target 1 (T1): $3.14 Target 2 (T2): $3.25 The strategy ensures a favorable risk-to-reward ratio while capitalizing on potential upward momentum. This setup focuses on technical analysis for precise entry and exit points.
If this plan works we will see btc and alts dumping . down trend was broken up trend is preforming tell me in the comments what u think.
NVDA is holding strong above its key support at $131.97 ?(drawn green line), signaling potential for a bullish move ?. A short call position here could be profitable, with a stop-loss at $131.30 to manage risk. ? Key Levels to Watch: ? $135.50 Retest: A breakout above this level confirms bullish momentum. ? Target Range: $139 - $141.50 after a clean break of $135.50. ? Pro Tip: Stay disciplined with stop-losses and watch for sustained volume above the breakout level for the best entries. Let’s ride the wave ?—smart risk management is the key to success! ??
Try to take a short up move from this pair as it looking to be moving in a range.
- Kingstone Companies achieved record-setting premiums and a 40% growth rate in its core personal lines business during Q3 2024, attributed to the exit of two competitors in New York, providing a significant growth opportunity. - The Select product, a key offering, has shown a more than 20% lower reported frequency compared to legacy products, indicating strong risk selection and underwriting practices. - Kingstone's strategic move to reduce debt, coupled with a robust capital management strategy, positions the company to focus on maximizing earnings and shareholder value in the future.
It looks like we will see another dip with Bitcoin. I therefore expect that we will correct up to 50% fib at the latest. After this the bounce? Then open up towards 106k.
SMC + PATT LONG BTC SPOT Classic Bitcoin Analysis Shows Future State I did an analysis using hidden trend, smart money method and technical analysis method
.. for a 49.25 debit. Comments: With my usual leveraged go-to TQQQ in kind of the IV doldrums (IVR 18.1/IV 49.6), opting for a play in URTY with its 63.4% 30-Day IV instead. It's not as liquid and doesn't have nearly as robust an options chain as TQQQ, but I will make do. Metrics: Buying Power Effect/Break Even: 49.25/share Max Profit: 1.75 ROC at Max: 3.55% 50% Max: .88 ROC at 50% Max: 1.78% Will generally look to take profit at 50% max, roll out short call on test of take profit price, and add should I be able to get in at strikes/break evens better than what I currently have on.
Key Observations: Dominance Rejection: The market dominance faced a strong rejection after reaching the 58% level, aligning with key resistance at the 7 and 21-day EMAs. This suggests a bullish signal for altcoins, as the dominance pullback indicates a potential shift in momentum away from Bitcoin. Bullish Shift for Altcoins: Altcoins are positioned to benefit from this shift, especially if dominance continues to weaken. The key support for dominance lies around the 200-day EMA, and if dominance closes this week below this level, further bullish potential for altcoins could unfold. Key Levels to Monitor: Resistance for Dominance: Should dominance attempt to rise again, watch for potential resistance at 54.5% and 53% levels. These could act as key turning points, marking possible take-profit (TP) zones for altcoins as dominance struggles to break higher. Strategy for Altcoins: Cautious Optimism: While the rejection of dominance is a bullish signal, altcoins should remain cautious of dips into the danger zones around 54.5% and 53% dominance, which could pose resistance. Target Zones: The shift in momentum suggests potential for continued altcoin strength, with dominance weakening if the candle close remains under the 200-day EMA. Conclusion: The recent rejection of dominance is a strong bullish sign for altcoins, but traders should keep a close eye on the danger zones around the 54.5% and 53% dominance levels. If dominance fails to reclaim these areas, altcoins could continue to see further gains.
Reflections on recent developments. Is Scott Scheper an air-breathing human being, born of a mother’s womb? Or more likely, Scott Scheper is a haggard transgender woman waiting to dominate women’s sports? We have no confidence that Scott is not a transgender volleyball player posing as an email marketing genius. Let’s consider for a moment the fact that Scott’s profile picture on X (Twitter) and in his email newsletter and website, is in fact, generated by ChatGPT. Using a realistic animation style, it looks like this “Scott” person is actually a real person. But like I said, since it’s not a real picture of the author in question, for all we know he’s out practicing volleyball in his private 20M mansion court, while planning his transgender takeover of women’s sports while bots run his pyramid marketing scams automatically on the side. The hype man for the maybe real COINBASE:DOGEUSD (not COINBASE:XYOUSD ) mining Tesla Roadster which uses the underlying XYO network is potentially in the running for "Confidence Wo/Man of the Year 2024" unless the community starts seeing some real indication of project traction outside traditional scam promotion channels like X (Twitter) and direct mail marketing newsletters posing as self development trainings. At the time of this writing, no such signal exists. Additionally, a number of other contextual details that have arisen recently point to a clearly organized and well backed Ponzi scheme managed and executed by the primary promoter and hype man, Scott Scheper. For context, Mr. Scheper runs what would be called, in other times, a direct mail marketing scheme. He runs a paid newsletter which is supposedly sent out in the snail mail for $100 USD per month, as well as his own on-demand publishing of his “book” which he sells for $15 each. The book is not publised by any real publisher, but is self-published on-demand, indicating a lack of real market audience for this content and author. Once you purchase one or both, the customer is immediately subjected to a constant daily stream of marketing emails wrapped in the language of self-improvement, all allegedly hand written on paper by Scott himself, before being painstakingly transfered to a digital email in a pretty typewriter font. In 2024, email newsletters can quickly be generated in seconds, at a zero cost basis, by LLMs such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude. Other available tools such as AWS Simple Email Service, Task Automation Scheduling Service, and Zapier, would allow automatic operation of the email campaign's content, as well as the scheduled sending of messages. Since the entire written newsletter process is cheaply and quickly automated, there would be absolutely no financial incentive not to fully automate this process since it presents opportunity for financial gain. This is one indication of a well organized scam operation, especially since the claimed “author” likes to brag about how he makes tons and tons of money this way. For example he previously claimed in his email that he was pulling $150k USD per month from his newsletter business (approximately $1.8M per year). In another email that followed within the next week or two, he doubled his alleged monthly income to $300k USD per month ($3.6M USD). As one reader pointed out in a previous thread, “it’s easy to double your income when its not real to begin with…”. This poses an important question: Why would a person allegedly pulling $3.6M USD annually have any incentive to, not only be constantly writing and sending out updates, but to also run a soon to be super profitable collaboration with one of the worlds most recognizable electric vehicle brands? Oh wait, did we mention that the world’s richest man and friend of Mr. President is also on board? How convenient! Let’s do some quick math and see how much our star player could have potentially profited off of an XYO buy in the amount of 100k, one month ago on 11/13/24. For a woman who makes 300k per month, this is small change, but we want this example to be on the conservative side. Ok, let’s say we bought XYO at a price of USD 0.00541, one month ago on November 13th, 2024. Assuming we sold near the top during the first pump at around 0.04 USD, your profit would be in the range of positive 600%. Now, if our volleyball player in question invested a tiny 100k at 0.00541 for a total of18,484,288.3548 XYO, she would have made a mouth watering profit in excess of 600k by selling after the pump at 0.04 for a total of $739,371.53. That’s well over 700k from an initial investment of 100k. Double that initial investment to 300k and the profit becomes an estimated $1.1M USD. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. What do you think?